11 January 2007

STICKing With Their Core Incompetencies

So, it looks like I may have been wrong about something. I figured that with the budget shortfall that NASA is likely to be facing, that NASA would slow down work on the CEV and CLV. You know, following their "pay as you go" philosophy. However, according to Griffin, NASA's main procurement priority in 2007 is the Ares I, and that:
"I will do everything I can to keep Orion and Ares I on schedule," he [Griffin] says. "That will be right behind keeping shuttle and station on track, and then after that we'll fill up the bucket with our other priorities."

Griffin's plan is that:
We will find what we believe are the lowest priority half-billion dollars in content, and we'll extract it, across the agency.

Now, I don't think NASA is dumb enough yet to trim out COTS, but I think that this more or less means that we won't be seeing anything new from Centennial Challenges for a while. But it will be interesting to see who gets the knife so the Shaft can fill a "badly needed gap" in US space launch capabilities.

Good to see that NASA is sticking so well to its core incompetencies.

Labels:

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

You would think that due to the budget crunch other engineering possiblities would, at least, be examined. Seems to me that NASA (aka GASA [Griffin's Aeronautics and Space Administration]) is buying a very expensive square block and shoving it into a round hole when is comes to VSE.

I do have a question, how can we change this?

-Joseph

1:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think that perhaps they might be dumb enough...

7:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with anonymous and think Nasa might be dumb enough which would hopefully be the tipping point forcing congress to take severe actions. If it happens it could be lightening swift as this isn't really a partisan issue.

Joseph: I'm beginning to think the the only way to change/rescue Nasa is brutal. Explicity ban Nasa from spending money on developing big rockets and force them to make do with commercially available launch systems (not even the funds to man-rate them - it's up to the seller to provide). This would change the present lose-lose situation to a win-win one.

Are there any other options that haven't been tried yet?

2:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com